top of page


Why Systematic Reviews Can’t Guide Clinically Relevant MLD Practice for Post-Knee-Replacement Clients
When it comes to clinical practice, what matters most to real-world MLD therapists simply isn’t what’s being measured in “Level I evidence”.
To understand this disconnect we need to revisit what evidence based practice really means.
Evidence based therapy is a synthesis of research evidence, clinical experience and observation, in the context of the desired outcomes of the recipient.
Relying on Level 1 evidence alone is just not enough. Yet systematic reviews and meta-analy
-
Oct 5, 20256 min read


Measuring clinically relevant outcomes
An easy - and free - way for therapists to assess clinical progress is to use an analogue scale. Image by Volodymyr Hryshchenko on Unsplash This can be a numeric scale such as the one developed in 1932 by Rensis Likert ( 1 ) to measure attitudes. Typically a 5- or 7-point ordinal scale, respondents rate the degree to which they agree or disagree with a statement. It is essentially a rating scale, usually presented as a score between 1 - 5 or 1 - 10, where the person selects
-
Jun 25, 20224 min read


How to write a case study and why we need them
Randomised controlled trials are not suited to assessing the effectiveness of treatments for lymphoedema and other choric diseases.
-
Apr 7, 20223 min read
bottom of page
.png)