top of page


Why Systematic Reviews Can’t Guide Clinically Relevant MLD Practice for Post-Knee-Replacement Clients
When it comes to clinical practice, what matters most to real-world MLD therapists simply isn’t what’s being measured in “Level I evidence”.
To understand this disconnect we need to revisit what evidence based practice really means.
Evidence based therapy is a synthesis of research evidence, clinical experience and observation, in the context of the desired outcomes of the recipient.
Relying on Level 1 evidence alone is just not enough. Yet systematic reviews and meta-analy

Jan Douglass PhD
Oct 5, 20256 min read


Measuring clinically relevant outcomes
An easy - and free - way for therapists to assess clinical progress is to use an analogue scale. Image by Volodymyr Hryshchenko on Unsplash This can be a numeric scale such as the one developed in 1932 by Rensis Likert ( 1 ) to measure attitudes. Typically a 5- or 7-point ordinal scale, respondents rate the degree to which they agree or disagree with a statement. It is essentially a rating scale, usually presented as a score between 1 - 5 or 1 - 10, where the person selects

Jan Douglass PhD
Jun 25, 20224 min read


How to write a case study and why we need them
Randomised controlled trials are not suited to assessing the effectiveness of treatments for lymphoedema and other choric diseases.

Jan Douglass PhD
Apr 7, 20223 min read
bottom of page
.png)